Forget the heal for cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer, or diabetes. Unless …

If you wish a cure for cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer, or diabetes, do not count on the academia, the National Institute of Health (NIH), or the biotech/pharmaceutical industry.  With all the money they need spent on researching these diseases, they have terribly very little to indicate for it.

In 1971, during the State of the Union address, President Nixon declared the war on cancer proposing “an intensive campaign to seek out a cure for cancer.”  Since 1971, Americans spent, through taxes, donations, and private R&D, about $200 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars.  This cash produced 1.fifty six million papers on cancer. Yet, today we tend to are no closer to a cure than we tend to were in 1971.  Why?

Contemplate what Dr. Almog said in his paper: Drug Trade in “depression” (Almog, D. Drug industry in “depression”. Med Sci Monit. 2005 Jan;11(1):SR1-4, I’d urge you to scan his paper, it’s an eye opener on relationship between tutorial analysis and business drug discovery): “When the fundamental science/biology of disease is not offered, no new drugs come to market.” With the billion of greenbacks spent by the NIH on basic science, and also the many papers revealed on the topic, the question is, “Why isn’t the basic science/biology of disease obtainable? Individual discoveries within the biology of human disease are cornerstone in new treatments. However, in drug discovery, these basic science/biology discoveries are seemingly unrelated dots. To connect the dots you wish a theory. The Blind Men and the Elephant may be a famous story concerning six blind men encountering an elephant for the primary time. Each man, seizing on the only feature of the animal, which he appeared to have touched initial, and being incapable of seeing it whole, loudly maintained his restricted opinion on the character of the beast. The elephant was considered a wall, a spear, a snake, a tree, an acquaintance or a rope, depending on whether the blind men had initial grasped the creature’s facet, tusk, trunk, knee, ear or tail. The story epitomizes the matter of the reductionist approach in biology. A recent book Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and also the Origin of Chronic Disease, by Hanan Polansky [11], presents an alternative. The book identifies the disruption that causes atherosclerosis, cancer, obesity, osteoarthritis, sort II diabetes, alopecia, type I diabetes, multiple sclerosis, asthma, lupus, thyroiditis, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, graft versus host disease, and other chronic diseases, and describes the sequence of events that leads from the disruption to the molecular, cellular, and clinical effects.”

What are the implications of the NIH failure?  A decline in the number of latest drugs introduced by pharmaceutical companies. Consider what professor Taylor says in his paper: Fewer new medicine from the pharmaceutical business (Taylor D. Fewer new medicine from the pharmaceutical industry. BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):408-9): “In 2002 spending on medicines exceeded $400bn (£248bn; 377bn) worldwide. Optimists within the pharmaceutical trade believe that the world market for their products can go on expanding by around 10% a year, with the United States continuing to guide towards higher per capita outlays. Expenditure on analysis by the pharmaceutical industry is also increasing worldwide. It’s currently over $45bn a year—twice the total recorded at the beginning of the 1990s—and projected to rise to $55bn by 2005-6. Considerations are growing, however, concerning the productivity of research being funded by the main pharmaceutical companies. … Empirical proof indicates a crisis in productivity in pharmaceutical research. The number of medicines introduced worldwide that contain new active ingredients dropped from an average of over 60 a year within the late 1980s to 52 in 1991 and only 31 in 2001. The number of new active substances undergoing regulatory review is still falling.”

On the one hand, the expenditure on research is increasing.  On the opposite, the quantity of latest drugs is decreasing.  The professionals decision this case the productivity crisis in drug discovery.

The NIH failed to provide the therefore abundant needed biology of chronic disease because it is caught within the reductionist mentality.  Dr. Hanan Polansky offers an alternative.  If we wish a cure for cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer, or diabetes, we tend to would like to noticeably contemplate his alternative.

Are Doctors Lying About the Cure for Diabetes?

“The People” have had enough apparently!

An “insider” revealed today that the “World of Medicine” is scamming people – and even worse: with the help of “law-makers!”

It seems that “money” (as usual) has blinded doctors and medical practitioners to the degree that they are now willingly *suppressing* the truth regarding diabetes – its control, management, and even its cure!

That’s right: “cure!”

And what should shock you even more:

It seems that it’s against the law to say the word “cure” when describing anything that actually cures you.

Yet it’s very much okay to say that something “treats” or helps “offset” the symptoms of some health condition or disease.

But if you say “cure” (and even including when you in fact have a real and bona fide cure for something and can even prove it!) you can get arrested.

Ever wonder why we have a “healthcare” industry and not a “healthcure” industry?

It’s simply because no one’s out to “cure” anyone because there’s little money in doing so.

Instead, keeping you sick and marginally pain-free is all anyone’s really out to do for you these days – as doing so means you being “forced” to buy all the same drugs over and over again, and again, and … (you get the point!)

Of course, if a cure came along it would mean you buy it one time, and then you’re cured – and that’s that (over and done!)

But a number of doctors, philanthropists, and just plain old “good folks” armed with “real answers” and “real solutions” are stepping up and are NOT afraid of “Uncle Big-Bully Brother!”

One courageous fellow by the name of Melford Bibens, CPT, is doing exactly this, as he overcame “naturally” the dreaded disease Diabetes!

Not only that, but Melford has lectured and personally helped individuals beat the disease to the point that proven sufferers have actually gotten re-diagnoses as “no longer having the disease at all!” (Something that’s pretty much always been ruled out as a possibility altogether! – and now which may even be against the law!)

But it’s not certain how long Melford will be allowed to do this because “Uncle Sambo” has actually started using “Gestapo” tactics whereby people and businesses truly offering “cures” have been raided with masked armed police who even go to the point of forcing customers in the stores to get down on the floor at gunpoint!

So, if you’re wise and want to find out about this while it’s still possible for you to do so, then just visit this link now:

   ~~~>  http://www.UltimateDiabetesSolution.com/piblji88

>

But don’t be surprised if one day soon you return to find this site completely removed with a US Flag waving in its place (in the name of “freedom” no less!)