Cure For Diabetes

April 10, 2010 by  
Filed under Videos

www.methedoctor.com — Cure for Diabetes. Diabetes is a serious medical condition that can lead to tissue damage, organ failure and in extreme cases even death. There have been many treatments developed over the years, however a cure for diabetes has been absent, until now. At www.methedoctor.com you will discover a process that many professionals do not want you to know about and yet the proof is in the results. Over 90% of loyal readers of this report have realized a complete cure for diabetes type 2! Even type 1 sufferers are seeing a marked improvement in symptoms. This cure for diabetes is ready and waiting for you to take advantage, do it today for a healthier tomorrow.

Read more

Forget the heal for cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer, or diabetes. Unless …

If you wish a cure for cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer, or diabetes, do not count on the academia, the National Institute of Health (NIH), or the biotech/pharmaceutical industry.  With all the money they need spent on researching these diseases, they have terribly very little to indicate for it.

In 1971, during the State of the Union address, President Nixon declared the war on cancer proposing “an intensive campaign to seek out a cure for cancer.”  Since 1971, Americans spent, through taxes, donations, and private R&D, about $200 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars.  This cash produced 1.fifty six million papers on cancer. Yet, today we tend to are no closer to a cure than we tend to were in 1971.  Why?

Contemplate what Dr. Almog said in his paper: Drug Trade in “depression” (Almog, D. Drug industry in “depression”. Med Sci Monit. 2005 Jan;11(1):SR1-4, I’d urge you to scan his paper, it’s an eye opener on relationship between tutorial analysis and business drug discovery): “When the fundamental science/biology of disease is not offered, no new drugs come to market.” With the billion of greenbacks spent by the NIH on basic science, and also the many papers revealed on the topic, the question is, “Why isn’t the basic science/biology of disease obtainable? Individual discoveries within the biology of human disease are cornerstone in new treatments. However, in drug discovery, these basic science/biology discoveries are seemingly unrelated dots. To connect the dots you wish a theory. The Blind Men and the Elephant may be a famous story concerning six blind men encountering an elephant for the primary time. Each man, seizing on the only feature of the animal, which he appeared to have touched initial, and being incapable of seeing it whole, loudly maintained his restricted opinion on the character of the beast. The elephant was considered a wall, a spear, a snake, a tree, an acquaintance or a rope, depending on whether the blind men had initial grasped the creature’s facet, tusk, trunk, knee, ear or tail. The story epitomizes the matter of the reductionist approach in biology. A recent book Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and also the Origin of Chronic Disease, by Hanan Polansky [11], presents an alternative. The book identifies the disruption that causes atherosclerosis, cancer, obesity, osteoarthritis, sort II diabetes, alopecia, type I diabetes, multiple sclerosis, asthma, lupus, thyroiditis, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, graft versus host disease, and other chronic diseases, and describes the sequence of events that leads from the disruption to the molecular, cellular, and clinical effects.”

What are the implications of the NIH failure?  A decline in the number of latest drugs introduced by pharmaceutical companies. Consider what professor Taylor says in his paper: Fewer new medicine from the pharmaceutical business (Taylor D. Fewer new medicine from the pharmaceutical industry. BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):408-9): “In 2002 spending on medicines exceeded $400bn (£248bn; 377bn) worldwide. Optimists within the pharmaceutical trade believe that the world market for their products can go on expanding by around 10% a year, with the United States continuing to guide towards higher per capita outlays. Expenditure on analysis by the pharmaceutical industry is also increasing worldwide. It’s currently over $45bn a year—twice the total recorded at the beginning of the 1990s—and projected to rise to $55bn by 2005-6. Considerations are growing, however, concerning the productivity of research being funded by the main pharmaceutical companies. … Empirical proof indicates a crisis in productivity in pharmaceutical research. The number of medicines introduced worldwide that contain new active ingredients dropped from an average of over 60 a year within the late 1980s to 52 in 1991 and only 31 in 2001. The number of new active substances undergoing regulatory review is still falling.”

On the one hand, the expenditure on research is increasing.  On the opposite, the quantity of latest drugs is decreasing.  The professionals decision this case the productivity crisis in drug discovery.

The NIH failed to provide the therefore abundant needed biology of chronic disease because it is caught within the reductionist mentality.  Dr. Hanan Polansky offers an alternative.  If we wish a cure for cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer, or diabetes, we tend to would like to noticeably contemplate his alternative.

Cure for the High Cost of Diabetes

Diabetes is more than just a devastating disease; it is a widespread epidemic currently affecting more than one in five older Americans, and it is exceptionally expensive. The cost of treatment for type 2 diabetics increased 32% from 2002 to 2007, when estimated diabetes expenses in the US totaled $116 billion in direct medical costs and $58 billion in indirect costs (disability, work loss, premature death). This is 10% of all dollars spent on health care in the US, with expenditures for people with diabetes more than two times higher than health care expenditures for non-diabetics.

This news is even more unwelcome in an unsteady economy where consumers are already concerned about the cost and availability of health care. A new Kaiser Family Foundation poll reports that half of American households cut back on health care as a result of financial concerns in the past year, with 16% reporting having postponed treatment for severe health problems — for instance, foregoing visits to the doctor for chronic illnesses like diabetes.

IT’S WORSE THAN IT SEEMS…

What’s occurring today is just the beginning, warns global economist and nutritionist Barry Popkin, PhD, director of the University of North Carolina’s Inter-Disciplinary Obesity Center. Diabetes was the seventh leading cause of death listed on US death certificates in 2006, a number he believes is, in all probability, “grossly understated” given the rapid changes in diet and body composition of the average American.

Meanwhile, rather than focusing on prevention of diabetes, which is highly possible for the majority of people, mainstream medicine continues to accentuate delivery of more expensive crisis management treatment, with a selection of pills and insulin that help manage, but do not cure the disease. Insurance companies are more likely to pay the very expensive cost of treating devastating complications, such as loss of sight or kidney damage, and for costly heart surgeries and amputations, than to pay the considerably modest cost of rigorous disease management or prevention with programs such as fitness trainers and dietetic education. Doing so would save money, as well as time and suffering. This short-sighted strategy backfires, individually and for our health care system as a whole, warns Dr. Popkin.

DOES PREVENTION ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM?

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assure that prevention really does work.

In the Diabetes Prevention Program study, lifestyle interventions reduced the development of diabetes in high risk people by 58% over a period of three years — and an even more impressive 71% in adults age 60 and older. In contrast, Metformin, the diabetes drug compared in this study to the lifestyle intervention, reduced diabetes risk only half as much.

•Comprehensive foot care programs can decrease amputation rates by 45% to 85%.
•Blood pressure management lessens the risk of heart disease and stroke in people with diabetes by 33% to 50%, and the risk of microvascular complications (eye, kidney and nerve diseases) by about 33%.
•Lowering blood pressure can minimize the decline in kidney function in people with premature diabetic kidney disease 30% to 70%.
•Identifying and treating diabetic eye disease with laser therapy can reduce the development of acute vision loss by about 50% to 60%.
•Managing LDL cholesterol can reduce cardiovascular complications by 20% to 50%.

The CDC claims that interventions to prevent or postpone pre-diabetes from advancing to type 2 diabetes can be practical and cost-effective. Dr. Popkin and I discussed how to shift the medical standard from one that reacts to crises to actually preventing them.

WHAT MUST CHANGE

It bores people to hear the same advice repeatedly, but the way to solve the issue of diabetes essentially has little to do with medical professionals or procedures. It has to take place at home. Americans at risk must resolve their weight issues. A primary cause for type 2 diabetes is obesity — one-third of American adults are obese whereas 17% of children are overweight or obese. Dr. Popkin’s book, The World Is Fat, describes how our lifestyle changes since World War II have produced the double epidemics of obesity and diabetes. We need to establish better eating habits and exercise programs, specifically…

Minimize snacking and sodas. Food and beverage companies sell an ever-growing number of high-calorie sodas and sweetened teas, sugary fruit juices, vitamin and energy drinks. The top 40% of consumers purchasing these beverages consume 760 calories per day from them, observes Dr. Popkin. Don’t fall for seductive marketing – instead, drink healthful and calorie-free water, or if you prefer something sweeter, enjoy a cup of tea or coffee with a bit of sugar. Satisfy hunger between meals by snacking on an apple, a few walnuts, or a handful of baby carrots rather than resorting to processed snacks, even supposedly healthy ones like granola and energy bars, which Dr. Popkin points out are typically stuffed with calories and fats.

Monitor portion control. At Cornell University, 85 nutrition experts were invited to an ice cream social where they were given bowls of various sizes. Interestingly, the experts who were given the bigger bowls served themselves almost a third more ice cream. The lesson: Keep a close eye on portion sizes. Use smaller plates and choose sensible serving sizes. If you’re eating meat for instance, this means three ounces (the size of a deck of cards) rather than the usual eight or more.

Determine ground rules prior to eating. In a current study of all-you-can-eat Chinese buffets, researchers found that overweight or obese diners more often choose large plates, chew less and eat everything they served themselves, which can lead to overeating. Especially if you are eating out, set ground rules in advance to make sure you’re aware of what and how you eat. For example, decide beforehand that you will drink water rather than a soft drink… Pass on dessert… Order salmon instead of prime rib… Eat slowly… And ask for a to-go container instead of cleaning your plate.

GET ACTIVE

Our armchair-and-TV culture is a major issue in the diabetes epidemic, with less than one-third of American adults participating in regular leisurely physical activity. In fact, one study found every two hours of television watched each day is associated with a 14% increase in diabetes. Luckily, most of us already own the solution — a pair of tennis shoes. There’s no need to join a gym or work up a heavy sweat. The research suggests that 43% of new cases of type 2 diabetes may be prevented by 30 or more minutes of brisk walking a day and less than 10 hours of watching TV per week.

PRACTICE GOOD DIABETES SELF-CARE

If you are at high risk for diabetes or currently have the disease, take essential steps to manage it. Working with medical professionals, carefully monitor and control levels of blood glucose, blood pressure and blood lipids, and stay on top of other preventive care practices (e.g., foot exams and eye screening), all of which help prevent potentially dangerous complications. If your doctor has prescribed insulin or other medication, take it exactly as prescribed and do not miss doses.

Individually, people pay a gigantic price — physically, emotionally and financially — for lifestyle choices that have encouraged diabetes. Our national budget is negatively affected as well. It’s in everyone’s best interest to bring this disease under control.

 

by: Arif Rahim
Cheap Diabetes Medical Supply